MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W749072871 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.13.2.2a

Women in A Word: Anne Claire Poirier’s Subversive Subjectivity

2004· article· fr· W749072871 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jessica Langston

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSubjectivityPhilosophyArtEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se basant sur des théories philosophiques, psychanalytiques et féministes, cet article étudie, tout d’abord, le processus par lequel la subjectivité construit, et est construite par la langue. Après avoir évalué la complexité et les limites de ce processus pour les femmes, l’auteure en discute le rôle dans Les Filles du Roy et De mère en fille d’Anne Claire Poirier. À travers la répétition de mots clés, Poirier semble représenter l’identité féminine selon les règles du système sémiologique masculin : la femme est construite comme objet passif. Cependant une lecture plus attentive de certaines séquences et de la polysémie des mots que Poirier utilise pour définir la féminité démontre que ces mots subvertissent la subjectivité que la culture patriarcale impose aux femmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207