MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W75287216 · doi:10.7202/1030115ar

Au service de la mémoire des Québécois depuis 1967

2015· article· fr· W75287216 on OpenAlex
Marcel Lajeunesse

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentation et bibliothèques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Bibliothèque nationale du Québec, créée en 1967, fait partie des institutions établies au cours de la Révolution tranquille, et sa création avait pour signification l’affirmation culturelle du Québec. Au cours de ses presque quatre décennies d’existence, la Bibliothèque nationale a connu un développement considérable, en s’enracinant au Québec et en s’affirmant au plan international. Elle a traversé des périodes difficiles, dont la plus connue est l’Affaire des manuscrits en 1972-1973, et elle a vécu jusqu’à récemment le dispersement de ses activités et de son personnel, dû à un problème récurrent d’espaces. Les trois lois qui marquent la vie de la Bibliothèque nationale expriment aussi les étapes de son évolution. D’abord, la loi de 1967 qui la crée, puis celle de 1988 qui lui accorde une autonomie de gestion considérable et enfin celle de 2001 qui lui donne un nouveau visage et une mission élargie. Par l’ouverture de la Grande Bibliothèque au centre-ville de Montréal en 2005, la nouvelle Bibliothèque nationale du Québec devient une institution culturelle de premier plan au Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it