MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W75442217 · doi:10.22456/1981-4526.4874

Manual de Pintura e Caligrafia: José Saramago e a viagem aos exercícios interdisciplinares

2006· article· pt· W75442217 on OpenAlex
Mari Lúcie da Silva Loreto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNau Literária · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Education Research
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Como um estudo comparativo entre artes visuais e literatura, busco investigar as construções discursivas de um e outro campo artístico a partir da obra Manual de pintura e caligrafia, que foi escrita por José Saramago em 1977. Talvez em nenhum outro livro de Saramago a temática da criação, do processo de escrever, tenha aparecido de forma tão contundente. Em outras palavras, o tema do “artista” buscando uma forma de expressão quer na “pintura” ou na escrita. Nesse sentido, este estudo tece uma reflexão sobre o jogo da linguagem, a crise da representação, a mimesis, (arte e natureza, realidade e ficção), a interpenetração de discursos, as relações interdisciplinares, entre outras questões.
 
 Palavras-chave: Saramago; arte; literatura; interdisciplinaridade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it