MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W76012603

急性胰腺炎:临床诊治新观点(世界胃肠病大会 2005)

2005· article· ja· W76012603 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
贾林, 袁世珍

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Pancreatol · 2005
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicOtolaryngology and Infectious Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

第13届世界胃肠病大会已于2005年9月10 ~ 14日在加拿大蒙特利尔顺利召开,第11届世界消化内镜大会也同期进行.这次会议涵盖了消化研究领域的最新进展及其产业新概念,包括胃肠病学、内镜实况转播、肝病学、外科学、蒙特利尔临床倡议(Montreal Clinical Initiatives)、胃肠病学的全球目标、产业座谈会(Industry Symposia)和继续教育项目等内容,急性胰腺炎(AP)则被列入外科部分,有一次专题报道.相对第12届曼谷世界胃肠病大会提出了急性胰腺炎诊治指南而言,本次大会在AP研究领域无热点进展.本文通过复习大会资料,就AP临床诊治新观点作一简要报道.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J PancreatolSame topicOtolaryngology and Infectious DiseasesFrench-language works237,207