Devoir vieillir et vouloir devenir : la reliance, enjeu initiatique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mieux vieillir et mieux mourir, mieux accepter notre vieillir et notre mourir : ces objectifs nobles et ambitieux s’inscrivent dans tout un courant de pensée et d’action qui émerge des inquiétudes de notre temps perturbé. Face à la technocratie, l’humanisme. Face à une conception rationaliste et positiviste de la science, une conception systémique et holistique. Face à l’homme morcelé, l’homme global. Face à la division du travail et à l’éclatement de la vie, la solidarité des êtres et des âges. Face à la société de déliance, des stratégies de reliance. La reliance, enjeu fondamental, pour que le devoir-vieillir devienne, par le biais d’initiations réinventées, un vouloir-devenir, source d’un autre vivre et d’un autre mourir, ou, si l’on veut, d’un autre mûrir. Cela mérite quelques explications, un regard sur notre société, son passé, son présent et son avenir, sur ses approches du vieillir et du mourir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".