MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W765128836

Tailoring Cellulose Nanocrystal, Polymer and Surfactant Interactions for Gels, Emulsions, and Foams

2015· dissertation· en· W765128836 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhen Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsNanocrystalPulmonary surfactantPolymerMaterials scienceCellulosePolymer scienceChemical engineeringNanotechnologyPolymer chemistryComposite materialEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis describes the investigation of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) in water and at interfaces in the presence of different water-soluble polymers and surfactants. The potential of producing hydrogels, emulsions, and foams using both CNCs and surfactants and polymers is extensively explored herein. Interactions between CNCs and polymers were studied by measuring adsorption of polymers on CNC-coated surface in quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) instruments. Hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl guar, and locust bean gum adsorbed onto CNC-coated surfaces, whereas dextran did not adsorb. Gelation of CNC dilute dispersions was found for the samples added with adsorbing polymers, whereas the introduction of non-adsorbing polymers showed no such change of rheological behaviors of CNC dilute dispersions. The further addition of negative surfactant SDS or non-ionic surfactant Triton X-100 disrupted the gels whereas cationic surfactant CTAB did not. These behaviors illustrate the complexities associated with including CNC dispersions in formulated water-based products where polymers and surfactants are commonly used as well. The adsorption of cationic surfactants on CNC particle surfaces and the associated change of CNC hydrophobicity were investigated. Surfactant-modified CNCs were then employed as emulsifying agents to determine the effects of stabilizing oil-water interface with CNCs after surfactant addition. Emulsion stability was substantially enhanced with the introduction of surfactants. Based on the chemistry of cationic surfactants, and the extent CNC surface hydrophobicity increases after surfactant binding, either oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsions were successfully produced. This in situ surfactant adsorption method thus offers a simple way of modifying surface hydrophobicity of CNCs and allows fine tuning of CNC-based emulsion properties. Adsorbing polymers were used together with CNCs to prepare stable emulsions. The introduction of polymers facilitated the production of emulsion droplets with enhanced stability and smaller diameters. Both polymer-coated CNCs and the extra polymers partitioned at the interface and worked as the emulsifiers in a synergistic manner, leading to a reduction in CNC coverage on the emulsion droplet surfaces. Furthermore, reversible thermogelation of the emulsion was obtained when thermosensitive polymers were added. No noticeable emulsion coalescence occurred after multiple cycles of heating and cooling treatments of the emulsion gels. Freeze-drying and air-drying of these emulsion gels produced oil powders containing oil content as high as 94 wt. %. Finally, highly stable wet foams were successfully produced using CNCs and the water-soluble polymer, methyl cellulose. The effect of CNC and methyl cellulose concentration on the stability of air-water interfaces was elucidated. Both foamability and foam stability were greatly improved by adding CNCs to methyl cellulose solutions. The CNC particles helped to retain fluid in the films and plateau borders between bubbles, increasing bulk viscosity, and impeding water drainage. We also demonstrated that adding various monomers to CNCs- methyl cellulose wet foams did not lead to noticeable foam breaking. The successful production of macroporous structures with tailored chemistry and properties was achieved by subsequent polymerization of the monomers added to the foam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207