MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W76616760

MERGULHANDO NUM MAR DE RELAÇÕES: REDES SOCIAIS COMO AGENTES DE TRANSFORMAÇÃO EM BAIRROS POPULARES

2005· article· pt· W76616760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeografia (Rio Claro) · 2005
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)UrbanizationDeconstruction (building)Context (archaeology)SociologyUrban spaceHumanitiesPopulationGeographyIntervention (counseling)Economic growthPsychologyArtRegional scienceDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article argues the social nets and agents role in the urban space production and it’s impact on the social-space procedures in three popular urbanization quarters of Salvador, Bahia. It points to the deconstruction of the classic center/periphery dichotomy and gives priority to the quarter as a special indenture for the contemporaneous urban geography studies. From the inquired data and information of popular quarters, the search looks for to built new approach methodologies of the low rent population “lived spaces” in order to underlie effective politics of participant planning in Salvador context, understanding the “quarters” as spaces of sociability and areas of priority in intervention. Key-words: popular quarters; social nets; urban peripheries; “lived spaces”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it