MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W76665774

COST Action FP1101 "Assessment, reinforcement and monitoring of timber structures"

2012· article· en· W76665774 on OpenAlex
Thomas Tannert, Philipp Dietsch, Clara Bertolini, Bohumil Kasal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)DisseminationRisk analysis (engineering)Multidisciplinary approachComputer scienceReinforcementEngineeringConstruction engineeringBusinessPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on the new COST Action FP1101 "Assessment, Reinforcement and Monitoring of Timber Structures". The objective of the Action is to increase confidence of designers, authorities and end-users in use of timber in the design of new and in the repair of old structures by developing and disseminating assessment, reinforcement and monitoring methods and guidelines. COST Action FP1101 will build on previous findings, target the existing shortcomings, benefit from multidisciplinary views and innovative solutions by the involved stakeholders, enable synergies between them, and provide an effective way of discussing and disseminating the results from on-going projects. The paper summarizes the relevant results from COST Action E55 and RILEM committee AST-215, provides the rational for the new Action, and gives an overview of the proposed scientific program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it