MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W766940301

Undergraduate information systems in the UK : analysing curriculum skills and industry needs

2014· dissertation· en· W766940301 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLoughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of StirlingUniversity of SurreyEdinburgh Napier UniversityQueen's University BelfastUniversity of the West of EnglandUniversity of ReadingUniversity of LeedsLiverpool John Moores UniversityRobert Gordon UniversityStaffordshire UniversityUniversity of AberdeenNewcastle UniversityUniversity of SouthamptonGlasgow Caledonian UniversityManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of LeicesterQueen's UniversityTrent UniversityNorthumbria UniversityNottingham Trent UniversityUniversity of WolverhamptonUniversity of PortsmouthTeesside UniversityUniversity of NorthamptonHeriot-Watt UniversityUniversity of WorcesterSouthampton Solent UniversityLoughborough University
KeywordsCurriculumKnowledge managementEngineering managementEngineeringMathematics educationMedical educationPedagogyComputer sciencePsychologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it