Derechos fundamentales y libertades económicas en el ordenamiento comunitario: la jurisprudencia Viking y Laval
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
introDuccion.—i. aproximacion general a la relacion entre Derechos funDamentales y libertaDes economicas en el orDenamiento juriDico comunitario: 1. La incorporacion de los derechos fundamentales como principios generales. 2. El caracter dual de la relacion entre derechos fundamentales y libertades economicas. 3. La funcion limitativa de los derechos fundamentales en el ordenamiento comunitario. 4. Los derechos fundamentales y la autonomia del ordenamiento comunitario.—ii. analisis De los asuntos Viking (c-438/05) y laVal (c-341/05): 1. Contextualizacion de la problematica en los asuntos Viking y Laval. 2. Eficacia horizontal o frente a particulares de las libertades economicas. 3. Derechos fundamentales como restriccion de libertades economicas. 4. Principio de proporcionalidad.—iii. epilogo: significaDo y consecuencias De los asuntos Viking y laVal: 1. Hacia una propuesta explicativa de la jurisprudencia Viking y Laval. 2. Eventuales repercusiones para el ordenamiento juridico espanol. 3. Consecuencias en el marco del ordenamiento juridico comunitario.— conclusiones.—bibliografia citaDa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it