Derechos fundamentales y libertades económicas en el ordenamiento comunitario: la jurisprudencia Viking y Laval
Bibliographic record
Abstract
introDuccion.—i. aproximacion general a la relacion entre Derechos funDamentales y libertaDes economicas en el orDenamiento juriDico comunitario: 1. La incorporacion de los derechos fundamentales como principios generales. 2. El caracter dual de la relacion entre derechos fundamentales y libertades economicas. 3. La funcion limitativa de los derechos fundamentales en el ordenamiento comunitario. 4. Los derechos fundamentales y la autonomia del ordenamiento comunitario.—ii. analisis De los asuntos Viking (c-438/05) y laVal (c-341/05): 1. Contextualizacion de la problematica en los asuntos Viking y Laval. 2. Eficacia horizontal o frente a particulares de las libertades economicas. 3. Derechos fundamentales como restriccion de libertades economicas. 4. Principio de proporcionalidad.—iii. epilogo: significaDo y consecuencias De los asuntos Viking y laVal: 1. Hacia una propuesta explicativa de la jurisprudencia Viking y Laval. 2. Eventuales repercusiones para el ordenamiento juridico espanol. 3. Consecuencias en el marco del ordenamiento juridico comunitario.— conclusiones.—bibliografia citaDa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".