MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W769173747 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r236-02

Continuous Model Simulations to Develop a Phased Approach for SSO Control in Piqua, Ohio

2010· article· en· W769173747 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ben Gamble, Derek Wride, Dave Burtner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl (management)Environmental scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The City of Piqua, Ohio, initiated a study to develop an alternative for meeting regulatory requirements regarding an active sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) in its wastewater collection system. Continuous hydraulic model simulations were used to study how to reduce the frequency of the city's SSO. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) version 5 built upon the city's existing model and validated the model based on reported annual SSO activity using continuous simulations. The city's collection system includes 192 km sanitary sewers. The city's wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) accepts an average flow of 175 L/s. Five-year continuous simulations were used to assess performance of an alternative that included an equalization (EQ) basin to store excess wet weather flows (WWFs) to greatly reduce SSO. The modeling identified existing system hydraulic capacity limitations and helped to optimize the EQ basin alternative. Optimization included using the model to identify an EQ basin location that uses gravity-in/gravity-out operation, minimizing infrastructure modifications. The continuous simulation approach resulted in a phased alternative and corresponding conceptual design that will provide the city with flexibility in controlling SSO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207