MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7704778

Automatic Wrapping of Legacy Code and the Mediation of its Data

2003· article· en· W7704778 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent therapy in endocrinology and metabolism · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceJava annotationProgramming languageJavaInterface (matter)Real time JavaClass (philosophy)Java appletWizardJava Modeling LanguageDatabaseOperating systemArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, Scientific and Engineering communities are employing Grid enabled software applications. To be widely adopted, Java applications in particular will require more support the integration of legacy applications [1]. Triana is an example of such an application and therefore, here, it is used to prototype the development of our plug-in legacy code support. C programming is the language used extensively for scientific applications and consequently, the requirement for a method to incorporate software and applications in C is of prime importance. In the future, we will include support for C++ and other languages. The software we are developing consists of three components: Jacaw [2], a datamediation interface and a compilation wizard Jacaw: Jacaw is used to generate a Java wrapper class that is used to call functions from the C library. The wrapper class uses JNI (Java Native Interface) to interface with the C library (which is compiled as a shared library) [3]. Figure 1: JACAW structure Data Mediation Interface: The data mediation interface automates the process of mediating the data types between the Java classes and the C function calls. This is accomplished by providing a graphical user interface (GUI) that takes the user through a set of steps to select the parameters for the wrapped function from an input class and then to initialize and set the data for the output class. For example, a Triana unit takes a Java data-type class as its input and outputs a Java data-type class (which can be different to the output class). Briefly, the GUI is divided into three sections. The first allows the user to choose the mapping of the Java instance variables (via Java-bean getParameter() type function calls) to the arguments of the C function call. The second stage allows the user to mediate the data returned from the C function to the Java code. Lastly, the user can then mediate any other data between the input Java class and the output Java class which may not be needed by the C function. The allows the input object to be decomposed and then reconstructed after the native call allowing the user to integrate the C function call without writing any Java code. Compilation Wizard: This module is a user friendly interface that complements JACAW. It enables compilation and creation of a shared library from legacy codes in order to incorporate applications written in C into Triana. The Wizard initially detects the operating system and instructs the user to select C source file(s), libraries, output file and takes the user through steps in selecting preferred C compiler to create. The following figure illustrates overall relation between Triana units [4] and use of legacy application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it