MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W771171050

An integrated water quality modeling system with dynamic remote sensing feedback

2007· article· en· W771171050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsWater qualityRemote sensingQuality (philosophy)System dynamicsComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A coupled hydrodynamic-optical water quality modeling system based on Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems (DDDAS) concepts that assimilates remote sensing data into a hydrodynamic model was developed and tested. The modeling system includes the hydrodynamic model (ALGE), a radiative transfer model (Hydrolight), and remote imagery (MODIS) as a dynamic feedback. The DDDAS was implemented through an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) with a small ensemble space. Large scale thermal structure and circulation patterns in Lake Ontario were simulated during the spring and summer seasons. High-resolution stream plume studies were performed in Conesus Lake and for the plume of the Niagara River in Lake Ontario. This work provided validation of the capabilities of the ALGE code to simulate the transport of sediment and passive tracer. Although the ALGE model produces predictions of the distribution of the TSS constituents, visual examination of MODIS 250 m reflectance data clearly shows discrepancies between themodel TSS output and the remote sensing data. These errors are due to the uncertainties in model physics, parameters, and forcing conditions. A Kalman filter-based method was implemented in this research to provide a better estimate of the modeled TSS. MODIS 250 m reflectance data was used as a dynamic feedback in EnKF. A test was performed at the single simulation grid point at the Genesee River mouth to validate the performance of the EnKF method. The EnKF estimate and the ensemble mean had similar and lower RMSE than any single run. Further validation was undertaken to examine the effects of assimilating MODIS data for all grid points to estimate the plume dissipation. Results show that the spatial filtering via an EnKF is capable of capturing the episodic nature of storm events by usingMODIS data as feedback. In this case the EnKF estimate RMSE is considerably smaller than the ensemble mean RMSE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it