MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W772334870 · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2015.06.010

Probabilistic coordination of microgrid energy resources operation considering uncertainties

2015· article· en· W772334870 on OpenAlexafffund
Walied Alharbi, Kaamran Raahemifar

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Systems Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrogridProbabilistic logicIntermittencyDistributed generationReliability engineeringWind powerBenchmark (surveying)Electric power systemMathematical optimizationComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)EngineeringPower (physics)Renewable energyElectrical engineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents probabilistic coordination of distributed energy resources (DERs) operation in an islanded microgrid with consideration of the associated uncertainties. In doing so, a comprehensive stochastic mathematical model is developed which incorporates a set of valid probabilistic scenarios for the uncertainties of load and intermittency in wind and solar generation sources. The uncertainty is addressed through a combination of a stochastic optimization model and additional reserve requirements. The model also includes hourly interruption costs for a variety of customer types as a means of determining the optimal probabilistic interruptible load whose reliability-based value is low enough to enable it to be shed if necessary. A case study is carried out using a benchmark microgrid; numerical results demonstrate that coordinated operation of DERs brings notable benefits in terms of expected operation costs and system security. This probabilistic coordination further reduces the consequences of the expected power dispatch of controllable generators and hourly unserved power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Systems ResearchSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207