MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W773475971

Hydrogen Sulfide And Arsenic-rich Waters Originating From Buried Wood Waste Along The Commencement Bay Waterfront, Tacoma, Washington

2007· article· en· W773475971 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stuart Scott Warren, Austin Stuart Hart, Isacc Saarman, Jeffrey H. Tepper

Bibliographic record

VenueSound Ideas (University of Puget Sound) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayHydrogen sulfideArsenicSulfideHydrogen sulphideEnvironmental scienceGeologyWaste managementSulfurOceanographyMetallurgyEngineeringMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thick accumulations of wood waste occur along the Commencement Bay waterfront at the sites of former sawmills. Recent studies have established that H (sub 2) S-rich water emanating from this wood waste inhibits the growth of eel-grass, an aquatic plant that provides vital habitat for juvenile salmon and other marine organisms. Efforts to restore the near-shore habitat of Commencement Bay must therefore include mitigation of these sulfide-rich waters. To better understand the origins of these waters we have analyzed D.O., pH, major ions and trace metals in a suite of samples collected from an approximately 100 year old sawdust pile located in the intertidal zone at N.45th St. and Ruston Way in Tacoma. These samples include pore water from within the pile (PW), fresh water from springs that may discharge into the pile (FW), and water from the bay itself (BW). Average concentrations of major cations in PW (Mg = 828 ppm, K = 306 ppm, and Cl =1150 ppm) are intermediate between those of FW (Mg = 14 ppm, K = 3 ppm, and Cl =39 ppm) and BW (Mg = 857, K = 333 ppm, and Cl = 1160 ppm), suggesting that PW represents a mixture between fresh water (5-15 %) and sea water (85-95%). Hydrogen sulfide levels in PW (avg. 2800 ppm) are dramatically higher than in FW (below detection) and BW (avg. 7 ppm), although total S is higher in BW (781 ppm) than PW (avg. 682 ppm). Trace metal contents of PW (avg. As = 72 ppb; avg. Mo = 35 ppb) are elevated relative to FW (avg. As = 15 ppb; Mo = 18 ppb) and BW (avg. As = 27 ppb, Mo = 23 ppb). We conclude that the permeable wood waste pile acts as an anoxic chamber in which BW SO (sub 4) (super 2-) is reduced to S (super 2-) . The pile also appears to be a source of As and Mo but future research is needed to determine whether these and other heavy metals originate from the wood waste itself or from an external water source that we have not yet sampled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)Same topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207