MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W773627075 · doi:10.1575/1912/5215

At Sea Test 2 deployment cruise : cruise 475 on board R/V Oceanus September 22 � 26, 2011 Woods Hole �Woods Hole, MA

2011· book· en· W773627075 on OpenAlexaff
Robert A. Weller, John M. Lund, Keith von der Heydt, Matthew Palanza, Steven Lerner, Tim Scholz, Christian Begler, Gregg Siddal, William M. Ostrom, Kris Newhall, Paul R. Bouchard, Kathleen McMonagle, Eric Jamieson, R.A. Petitt, Jeff O’Brien, Gary Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution eBooks · 2011
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
FundersWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionConsortium for Ocean LeadershipNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCruiseOceanographySoftware deploymentFoundation (evidence)On boardTest (biology)Environmental scienceAeronauticsGeographyPolitical scienceGeologyEngineeringArchaeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The R/V Oceanus, on Cruise 475, carried out the deployment of three moorings for the Coastal and Global Scale Nodes (CGSN) Implementing Organization of the NSF Ocean Observatories Initiative. These three moorings are prototypes of the moorings to be used by CGSN at the Pioneer, Endurance, and Global Arrays. Oceanus departed from Woods Hole, Massachusetts on September 22, 2011 and steamed south to the location of the mooring deployments on the shelf break. Over three days, September 23-25, Oceanus surveyed the bottom at the planned mooring sites, deployed the moorings, and carried out on site verification of the functioning of the moorings and moored hardware. Oceanus returned to Woods Hole on September 26, 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution eBooksSame topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207