MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W775020850

The Grand Orchestra: A Humanistic Conceptualization of Group Music Therapy in Dementia Care/Le Grand Orchestre : Conceptualisation Humaniste De Musicothérapie De Groupe En Soins Auprès Personnes Atteintes De Démence

2014· article· fr· W775020850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa Jessop

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicMusic Therapy and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusic therapySingingPsychologyDementiaDignityEnthusiasmPsychotherapistCreativityHumanismMedicineSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1998 I have specialized in working with older adults living in long-term care homes. I have learned so much and in turn have always striven to provide an experience that is meaningful for each group as a whole and for each individual within each group. In 2003 I completed a major research project in partial fulfilment of the Master of Music Therapy degree at Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario, Canada. This was an important opportunity to better understand and articulate my own practice facilitating group music therapy sessions.Unfortunately, my enthusiasm for music therapy in geriatric and dementia care seems at odds with common negative stereotypes and misconceptions about what it means to work musically with older adults in long-term or extended care. Much of the music therapy literature in dementia care as comprehensively summarized by Brotons (2000] described cognitive, behavioural, social, and emotional treatment interventions without considering creativity. Ruud (2010] emphasized that respecting the dignity and musical identities of individuals involved in music therapy sessions is a priority. This important work is too often considered repetitive, boring, and uninspiring, largely because of the belief that working with the elderly involves singing the same songs day after day. But if singing old songs and thrusting instruments into frail hands to play along is believed to be the extent of the work, then I mourn a lost opportunity. It is possible to improvise with older adults: I have even used atonal music and observed great responses!The theoretical underpinnings of my music therapy clinical practice in dementia care have been informed by the work and writings of Australian music therapist, Ruth Bright (1972,1988,1997]. Bright's belief that persons with dementia possess the capacity to be creative inspired me and is the lens through which I have perceived and nurtured relationships with music therapy clients. Bright motivated me to hear, see, and cultivate the gems of musical creativity that are still present and accessible to persons with dementia.Much of the work done with the elderly focuses on who individuals were, which is echoed through theme and reminiscence-based programs intended to access and engage long-term memory. But I prefer to focus on individuals as who they are now. My approach is very much in the moment; I focus on the persons as they are that particular day. My goals have never been to a person with dementia, but to support the person in the best ways I can. For years now, my philosophy has been to assist persons to reach their fullest potential and improve their quality of life.Thus finding creative ways to engage older adults with dementia has been my mission, and as an advocate for music therapy in dementia care, my hope is that this paper will give music therapists a fresh perspective on a specialization that will only become more important-at least here in Canada (Milan, 2011)-as the population ages.BackgroundMy master's research was inspired by my passion to understand clinical observations and the ways in which persons with dementia were responding in the most extraordinary ways during music therapy sessions. I was witnessing individuals with moderate cognitive impairments spontaneously offering intentional verbal and non-verbal communication through vocal work and purposeful interactions with others using instruments; I was observing them demonstrating sophisticated physical movements like those of instrumentalists, conductors, and dancers; and I was seeing them responding musically in ways that may not be considered typical for this client group. In keeping with Maslow's (1943,1968,1973) theory of human motivation and his well-known hierarchy of basic needs, I believed that clients demonstrated a heightened human experience in group music therapy, which in fact could be described as being self-actualized. By modifying the concept of self-actualization to include music and musical relationships, I proposed a model of musical self-actualization (Jessop, 2003). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of music therapySame topicMusic Therapy and HealthFrench-language works237,207