MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W775296501

WINTER STRATEGIES FOR THE SEASON AHEAD

2005· article· en· W775296501 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R W Stidger

Bibliographic record

VenueBetter roads · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnow removalGlobal Positioning SystemComputer scienceDecision support systemTransport engineeringWeather forecastingBridge (graph theory)Information systemEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyOperations researchSnowEngineeringTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article surveys different state departments of transportation for winter maintenance technologies. Focus is on the software capabilities of the Federal Highway Administrations Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS). The MDSS uses state-of-the-art weather forecasting, data fusion, and optimization techniques and integrates them with computerized winter road maintenance rules of practice. MDSS ultimately provides agencies with a specific forecast of road surface conditions and treatment recommendations customized for snow plow routes, such as whether to plow or use chemicals or abrasives, and when to apply treatments. The article includes descriptions of MDSS field demonstrations in Iowa, Michigan, and Canada. describes MDSS subsystem support from the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmosphere administration Forecast systems laboratory are detailed and MDSS system capabilities listed. Demonstrations of MDSS in the field in Iowa, Michigan and Canada are chronicled. A brief discussion of some the newest winter maintenance technologies is included such as pre-wetted salt, infrared thermometers, high speed spreaders, rubber snowplow blades, automatic vehicle location (AVL) systems using Global Positioning System (GPS), advanced road weather information systems (RWIS), and automatic bridge de-icing systems

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBetter roadsSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207