Bibliographic record
Abstract
Martin, Nicholas, ed. Schiller: National Poet-Poet of Nations. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006. 341 pp. $86.00 hardcover. This volume is a collection of 16 papers (plus introduction) originally presented at a conference at the University of Birmingham (U.K.), which was held in June 2005 to commemorate the 200th anniversary of Schiller's death. Twelve of the contributors hold positions at universities in the United Kingdom (Paul Bishop, Steffan Davies, John Guthrie, David Hill, K. F. Hilliard, Alexander Kosenina, Francis Lamport, Nicholas Martin, Maike Oergel, T. J. Reed, Ritchie Robertson, and Lesley Sharpe), while two are in Germany (Jochen GoIz and Norbert Oellers), and one each in the United States Geffrey L. High) and Canada (David Pugh). Twelve of the essays are in English, and four in German; they vary in length from 12 to 25 pages. The volume's unifying theme is Schiller's position as a or trans-national figure (21), but the topic is taken very broadly, and one finds here a wide range of approaches and subj ect matter. Reed pays tribute to Schiller for his perseverance despite long years of illness, while Oellers contrasts his unheroic heroes with critics' long-held view of Schiller himself as a hero (Heros). Sharpe addresses Schiller's relationship to three theaters of his day (Mannheim, Weimar, Berlin), particularly with respect to their repertoire; GoIz discusses what he calls the self-contradictory nature of Schiller's efforts as a publisher of his own works; and Davies assesses Schiller's staging of Goethe's Egtnont not as a low point, but as the beginning of a constructive period in the GoetheSchiller relationship. Another group of essays deals more directly with Schiller's works: close textual readings are offered by Hill, who compares the earliest dramas of Schiller with those of J.M.R. Lenz; by Robertson, who investigates Schiller's Jesuit figures; and by Guthrie, who shows how Schiller uses gesture to complement text. Common thematic denominators are found by Lamport, who argues that Schiller's characters typically face problems of balancing their national mission (159) against personal considerations, and High, who shows that in all but one of Schiller's late dramas the first act establishes a situation of occupation as the backdrop against which the characters' moral conflicts are developed. Hilliard problematizes representation in Schiller's works, asking how the representative is prevented from usurping the thing or person it represents. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".