A New Multiaxial Fatigue Life and Crack Growth Rate Model for Various In-Phase and Out-of-Phase Strain Paths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new multiaxial fatigue parameter for in-phase and out-of-phase straining is proposed. The parameter proposed is the sum of the normal energy range and the shear energy range calculated for the critical plane on which the stress and strain Mohr's circles are the largest during the loading and unloading parts of a cycle. The normal and shear energies used in this parameter are divided by the tensile and shear fatigue properties, respectively. The proposed parameter, unlike many other parameters, does not use an empirical fitting factor. The proposed parameter successfully correlates multiaxial fatigue lives for: (a) various in-phase and out-of-phase multiaxial fatigue straining conditions, (b) tests in which a mean stress was applied normal to the maximum shear plane, and (c) out-of-phase tests in which there was additional hardening. An effective (closure free) intensity factor range, ΔKeff, was derived based on the proposed parameter. This effective intensity factor successfully correlated the closure-free crack growth rates for straining of various biaxial strain ratios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".