The role of buspirone for the treatment of cerebellar ataxia in an older individual.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Buspirone, a 5HT-agonist and D2-dopamine antagonist/agonist, has modest beneficial effects in younger individuals with cerebellar ataxia. However, it is unclear whether it is beneficial and tolerable in older ataxic individuals. OBJECTIVE: To determine if an older individual with cerebellar ataxia would benefit from and tolerate buspirone. METHODS: We performed a single-subject, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized-phase study. The 80 year-old subject was to undergo six 4-week testing periods, divided randomly into three treatment and three placebo arms with a 2-week washout period between each arm. Treatment consisted of buspirone hydrochloride. Outcomes were clinical gait and balance testing, posturography testing, and subjective measurement of balance confidence. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant objective improvements with buspirone. The subject experienced a subjective improvement in balance confidence and tolerated treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Single-subject studies can help when it is unclear whether drug trial results with young subjects are generalizable to an older subject. This single-subject study determined that buspirone was tolerable but not clearly beneficial for an ataxic older individual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".