I-69 EXTENSION WOULD STRETCH FROM CANADA TO MEXICAN BORDER
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Indiana portion of a proposed I-69 extension running from the Mexican to Canadian borders through Texas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois and Michigan drew some 2,000 participants at hearings to determine a Tier 1 corridor. Indiana Department of Transportation (InDOT) hopes to next go to Tier 2 and study more specific alignments. The least expensive option would follow existing alignments of U.S. 41 and I-70, a path preferred by environmental groups, who fear a new road could hurt commerce along U.S. 41. The costs range from $800 million to $1.8 billion. Work is already underway on segments in Tennessee, Kentucky and Texas, which is the longest single state segment, at 1,000 miles. It's expected to be planned in three different legs, with design studies starting in 2003.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it