MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W780513288

Produção científica docente em tratamento temático da informação no Brasil: uma abordagem métrica como subsídio para a análise do domínio

2007· article· pt· W780513288 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jane Coelho Danuello

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2007
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersModernaMcGill University
KeywordsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at characterizing the scientific production of professors in the area of Subject Treatment of Information – S.T.I., 77 Journal articles by 19 post-graduation professors acting in the field, were selected, so as to detect the characteristics of this production and information sources utilized by authors- professors which may provide a wider knowledge of the area as an academic acting space. From the information provided by these articles, a database encompassing fields such as author, title of the article, title of publication, keywords, citations, country, language, year of publication and institution of the author, was compiled. The VantagePoint software, which organizes the information allowing the generation of lists and data-crossing matrices, which in turn enable one to verify the existing relationships among the fields, was used. As for the productivity of authors-professors who are distributed in 5 universities (USP, UNESP, UFMG, UnB and UFF), a data analysis showed that group kept an average of 4 to 5 articles per year, from 1990 to 2006. These articles were published in four languages – Portuguese, English, Spanish and France – in 27 Journals of 9 countries, being 18 published in Brazil and a strong trend to publish in renowned and high quality Journals was seen. An analysis of the 817 references contained in the articles, revealed a total of 659 authors cited and a 50% preference for books, as an information source, as well as the predominance of classical authors of the area, used as a theoretical base. In addition, some 20% of the professors’ production in the literature used in the area, was identified, thus characterizing the impact and importance of this production for the field. The subjects approached were identified from the key-words utilized, demonstrating a predominance of interest for the processes of the area, being indexing the most frequent subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0450.047
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207