Bibliographic record
Abstract
I ntraprovincial trade in Canada has changed over the last 20 years, particularly since the modifications in economic policy implemented in the mid-1980s that led to trade and financial opening. Canada had traditionally maintained greater protection for its investments and trade until the mid-1980s. However, it gradually became completely in step with the new form of trade relations in the world: globalization. This implied greater openness, which can be clearly observed recently not only in its deeper trade and financial ties to the United States, but also in its provincial trade, which has changed destination. It is important to answer the questions: Why have international exports grown significantly while Canada’s internal trade has dropped, and what is the short-term impact of this? My answer is that globalization has linked Canada’s provinces more to the United States than among themselves. This erodes trade relations within the federation and, more than characteristic of development, I see it as a medium-term problem, for several reasons. The first is that the world economy has not yet been able to recover from Intraprovincial Trade And Intelligent Borders in Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".