MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W78263800

Rangers, Mounties, and the Subjugation of Indigenous Peoples, 1870-1885.

2004· article· en· W78263800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew R. Graybill

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousFrontierGeographyEthnologyWhite (mutation)Government (linguistics)ArchaeologySettlement (finance)SocioeconomicsHistoryPolitical scienceEcologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the 1840s and 1850s, more than 300,000 traders and overland emigrants followed the Platte and Arkansas rivers westward across the Central Plains, the winter habitat of the bison. The rapid environmental degradation of this area had the ·effect of driving the bison to the extreme Northern and Southern Plains, where white hide-hunters slaughtered the animals.1 By the mid-1870s indigenous peoples at both ends of the grasslands, in places such as the Texas Panhandle and the upper Missouri River valley, fiercely defended the dwindling herds in an attempt to avoid starvation.2 The Indians' predicament was not theirs alone, however, as Native efforts at self-preservation posed a significant threat to Euro-American plans for the frontier. To that end, government officials on the peripheries of the Great Plains developed a remarkably similar strategy: the use of mounted constabularies to pacify indigenous peoples. Indeed, the North-West Mounted Police were created and the Texas Rangers renewed and reorganized in the early 1870s specifically to address the pressing "native question" confronting Texas and western Canada, among the few places where bison still roamed after 1870. Of course, 'authorities in Austin and Ottawa relied on other armed forces to wrest control of their hinterlands away from indigenous peoples most notably the US Army and the Canadian militia-but no two groups rendered more effective service in this regard than the Rangers and the Mounted Police.3 Few scholars have situated the efforts of these constabularies within the context of the rapidly changing conditions for Indians on the Great Plains after 1865. Studies of the Rangers tend to regard their post-Civil War anti-Indian vigilance as merely the continuation of an inevitable conflict between incompatible cultures, while Canadian historians have overlooked the more coercive dimensions of the Mounties' duties, especially in the 1870s.4 An examination of the two forces, however, reveals that both Austin and Ottawa called on their rural police to manage indigenous populations facing societal collapse, and that the constabularies responded in similar fashion: by controlling or denying the Natives' access to the bison.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207