MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W784331898

Oil dispersant system for fixed wing aerial platform

2015· dissertation· en· W784331898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nathan Brazil

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersantOil spillEngineeringSubmarine pipelineContainment (computer programming)Marine engineeringPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental sciencePetroleumComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global energy demand has led to increased oil production across the world, leading to an increase in the number of offshore oil platforms and oil tanker traffic. Further, this demand has pushed the industry to develop in increasingly remote areas and harsh environments. Newfoundland, which operates the largest offshore oil platform in the world, has a strong safety record, but limited disaster response capabilities. The Newfoundland ecosystem is particularly sensitive to the effects of an oil spill, with its diverse marine life, rugged coastline, and harsh climate. Further, these harsh conditions reduce the effectiveness of standard containment and recovery options for oil spills used elsewhere. The author seeks to address the issue by designing a deployable oil dispersant system for fixed wing aircraft. Oil dispersants sprayed onto the surface of an oil slick remain one of the most effective methods for mitigating the effects of an oil spill. The primary focus of this thesis is the preliminary engineering design of the system, which includes the use of theoretical and computational stress analysis techniques, aerodynamics, and rigid body dynamics considering the motion of the system. The thesis concludes with the preliminary system design of a deployable oil dispersant system that is adaptable to multiple aircraft platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207