MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W784940060

Evaluation of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) collection

2005· article· en· W784940060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFolia Horticulturae · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypericum perforatumPerennial plantHerbBiologyCultivarBotanyPlant cultivationMedicinal plantsHorticultureTraditional medicineMedicinal herbsAgronomyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

St. John’s wort is a perennial medicinal plant commonly cultivated in Poland. St. John’s wort herb, collected at the beginning of its flowering, has a broad spectrum of medical applications. In recent years St. John’s wort plantations have been infected by fungi Colletotrichum gleosporioides (Penz.), which has caused necrosis of whole plants. In the Research Institute of Medicinal Plants (RIMP) a collection of 10 accessions was gathered to evaluate their morphological traits, secondary metabolites content and resistance to pathogen in comparison with cultivar ‘Topaz’. The two-year evaluation of the collection made it possible to select accession nr 7, coming from Czarny Las near Ostrzeszow, whose plants showed C. gleosporioides tolerance and a high content of secondary metabolites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it