MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W785684178

Injury risks in collisions involving buses in Alberta

2011· article· en· W785684178 on OpenAlex
Md Mahmudur Rahman, Lina Katan, Richard Tay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 90th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollisionTransport engineeringTruckPoison controlEngineeringAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceComputer securityMedicineEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigated the factors that contributed to injury in collisions that involved at least one bus in the province of Alberta. In this study, all kinds of buses (i.e. school bus, transit bus, intercity bus and other bus) crashes were considered. Four separate logistic regression models were calibrated: 1. single vehicle collisions on highways; 2. single vehicle collisions in non-highway locations; 3. two vehicles collisions on highways; and 4. two vehicles collisions on non-highway locations. The contributing factors to collision severity examined were: weather condition, characteristics of collision partner, collision partner's driver age, bus driver age, bus, age, grade and sag sections, lighting conditions and collision location. Our analysis showed that weather condition was a significant contributing factor in all four types of collisions. Interestingly, adverse weather condition resulted in fewer injuries. Our results also showed that types of collision, characteristics of collision partner, collision partner's driver age and weather condition had significant effect on severity level for collisions occurring on both highway and non-highway locations. Additionally, the driver age of bus and collision partner were found to be significant factors in collision severity. Other factors were shown to affect injury risk only in one particular situation. For instance, for highway related collisions, driver age of collision partner had significant effect on severity levels whereas the age of the bus driver didn't. In addition, for highway collisions, collision severity was higher for head-on crashes, bus-bus crashes, bus-truck crashes, bus-motorcycle crashes, older buses, on grade and in sags, during dark and sun glare whereas probability decreased with larger outside shoulder width. For non-highway locations, crashes occurring near tunnel/underpass/overpass/signalized intersection were shown to result in higher probability of injury. Our results also showed that pedestrian involved single-bus collisions on non-highway road had higher injury risk than involvement of any other objects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it