MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W786618282

破伤风-白喉疫苗免疫后成人配方的破伤风-白喉-无细胞百日咳疫苗接种的间隔时间

2006· article· zh· W786618282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Halperin, Sweet, Baxendale, 郭京蓉, 刘梅影

Bibliographic record

VenueInt J Biologicals · 2006
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目前成人配方的破伤风-白喉-无细胞百日咳疫苗(Tdap)已推荐用于预防青少年及成年人百日咳。但如果在接种含有破伤风和白喉类毒素(TD)的疫苗(包括用于婴幼儿的TD或用于大龄儿童和成人的Td)后短期内又接种Tdap就极有可能出现严重的接种部位反应,包括Arthus反应(局部过敏坏死)。为评价Tdap接种后出现的不良反应是否与距上次接种TD/Td的间隔时间有关,加拿大Dalhousie大学的Halperin等在全省范围进行了一项开放标记的临床试验,比较了TD/Td接种后间隔18个月~9年和10年以上再接种Tdap的反应原性。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInt J BiologicalsSame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207