MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7870198 · doi:10.1007/bf00173029

Quaternary alkaline and calc-alkaline basalts in southern British Columbia: mixed signals from mantle sources above the southern edge of the Juan de Fuca–Pacific slab window

2008· dissertation· en· W7870198 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christa L. Sluggett

Bibliographic record

VenueNaunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindow (computing)BasaltSlabGeologyMantle (geology)Slab windowGeochemistryQuaternaryGeographyOceanographySubductionSeismologyOceanic crustPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subaerial lava flows of the Quaternary valley lavas mark the end of Chilcotin Group intraplate volcanism in southern British Columbia.Two geographically defined units are recognized: the Quilchena and Lambly Creek lavas.Erupting intermittently from discrete centres, lava flowed into existing paleodrainages from 1.5 Ma (Lambly Creek) to 780-100 ka (Quilchena).Erosion removed most of the estimated 8.8-21.1 km 3 of lava.Internal features are well preserved, some indicative of flow inflation and transport direction.The lavas are alkaline to calc-alkaline basalts, trachy-basalts, basaltic andesites and trachy-basaltic andesites, with trace element characteristics similar to ocean island basalt and εNd values from +8.0 to +8.4.The magmas resulted from partial melting of garnetiferous asthenosphere that upwelled through the subducted Nootka Fault and thermally eroded Explorer and northern Juan de Fuca plates south of a slab window.Geochemical modelling indicates that the mantle source was heterogeneous, composed of variably enriched peridotite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNaunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of PharmacologySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207