MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W787845032 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v30i2.11923

The Unpolitical. On the Radical Critique of Political Reason

2009· article· en· W787845032 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Massimo Cacciari, Alessandro Carrera, Mássimo Verdicchio, Davide Panagia

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Theory and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsArtPhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

of Italy," Simon Levis Sullam traces a double itinerary, sketching a history of Jewish Italian linguists from Graziadio Isaia Ascoli (mid-Ottocento) to Rabbi Umberto Cassuto (early Novecento) and Benvenuto Terraccini (1920Terraccini ( -1960's)'s), and applying their precepts to the "questione della lingua" as manifested in the work of twentieth-century Italian Jewish authors. In this regard, Svevo displays a zerodegree of Jewish linguistic identification, while Saba devotes lively pages to local Italian Jewish speech in the section "Gli ebrei" of Ricordi-Racconti, as do Ginzburg in Lessico famigliare, Bassani in Giardino dei Finzi-Contini, and Levi in the "Argon" chapter of Il sistema periodico. Sullam concludes on a poignant note-that by now, these linguistic residues have lost their direct referential function and instead serve as signs of nostalgia, that the language of the Jews has become "a structure of memory more than a structure of life: a true lieu de mmoire" (194).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.033
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicCritical Theory and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207