MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W790032896

Economic Sentiment Changes in the Lubelskie Voivodeship in the 4th Quarter of 2011

2012· article· en· W790032896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mieczysław Kowerski, Jarosław Bielak, Dawid Długosz, Mariusz Poninkiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueBarometr Regionalny Analizy i Prognozy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicPolish socio-economic development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyAttractivenessEuropean unionEastern PolandEconomyBusinessEconomicsInternational tradeArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lubelskie Voivodeship (one of 16 Polish voievdeships) is situated in the south-eastern part of Poland in the interfluvial zone of the Vistula and Bug Rivers . On the west and north it borders on Mazowieckie Voivodeship, on the south on Podkarpackie, and on the south-west on Świetokrzyskie Voivodeship . On the east the Lublin region borders on Belorussia and Ukraine, creating at the same time the external border of Poland and the European Union . The location of the Lubelskie Voivodeship assures convenient room for economic growth on the capacious eastern markets . The Lublin region is located along the major transport routes linking the eastern and western part of the European continent . Across the area of the voivodeship run the shortest roads and railways through Berlin and Warsaw up to Minsk in Belorussia, Moscow in Russia, Luck, Kiev, Lviv and Odessa in Ukraine . Apart from that, the voivodeship is regarded as a peripheral region with a low level of economic development and capital expenditure attractiveness . The Lubelskie Voivodship’s area is 25 123 km2( 2), which makes up 8% of the country’s territory and places it in the third position among the Polish voivodeships . The Lubelskie Voivodeship belongs to the depopulated regions . At the end of 2010 Lubelskie Voi vodeship was inhabited by 2 151 009 people (5,6% of the citizens of Poland) . The region is characterized by a very low level of economic development . The expression of this is lower gross domestic product (GDP) per person comparing with the country’s average; in 2009 it was 67,2% the country’s average and was the lowest in Poland . At the same time the GDP per person created in the Lubelskie Voivodeship was only 37% of the EU average . The structure of GDP and a gross added value in Lubelskie Voivodeship is slightly different than in the rest of the country . First of all there is a great contribution of agriculture, hunting, fishing and forestry to the creating of gross added value . On the other hand the contribution of the industrial and commercial services related to finance, real estate and company’s services in creating GDP is much lower than the country’s average . The labour efficiency per worker measured by gross added value of production is considerably lower in general as well as in individual

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBarometr Regionalny Analizy i PrognozySame topicPolish socio-economic developmentFrench-language works237,207