HRB National psychological wellbeing and distress survey: baseline results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary To summarise, the age distribution of the sample mirrored that of the national adult population, with 86% of the sample between the ages of 18 years and 64 years and 14% of the sample aged 65 years or over. Nearly one-half of the sample was married, more than one-half was employed, one-fifth was professionals/managers, while over one-quarter reported other non-manual occupations. The majority of respondents had attained second-level education; more than one-half was in the category main earners; and one-half was in paid employment. The reported weekly household income of one-half of the respondents was in the range of 500–749 Euro. Nearly one-half of respondents lived in a small town with a population less than 5,000 people, with about one-third being from the city and county of Dublin. Nearly one-half had private medical insurance, and the majority did not have any dependent children living with them. The majority of those who had children had one or two dependent children living in their household.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".