Bibliographic record
Abstract
Said: A Legacy of Emancipation and Representation Adel Iskandar and Hakem Rustom, editors Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010 (548 pages, index) $65.00 (cloth), $29.95 (paper)*Edward Said''s Rhetoric of the Secular Mathieu E. Courville Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010 (548 pages, index) $65.00 (cloth), $29.95 (paper)Reviewed by Anthony AlessandriniOn the back cover of Adel Iskandar and Hakem Rustom's edited collection Said: A Legacy of Emancipation and Representation is a quote from Cornel West: Edward Said was the greatest public in the late twentieth-century United States. Yet the many dimensions of his genius have yet to be fully appreciated. It would be hard to dispute the first half of this formulation; with the exception of Said's friend and colleague Noam Chomsky, it is impossible to think of an who had as much influence upon US public life during this period as Said. It is equally difficult to disagree with West's second point, but I would go a step further and suggest that the two statements are in fact connected. It would be an exaggeration to suggest that Said's position as a public is directly responsible for the larger failure to come to terms with the full dimensions of his work, but there is nevertheless a connection, in that of his most important ideas have tended to be flattened out and simplified in their application both within the academy and in other contexts.This situation makes the appearance of the two books under review here particularly heartening; although they approach Said's body of work from very different angles, both books are valuable contributions to the larger effort to address Said's legacy. Said: A Legacy of Emancipation and Representation is a large and ambitious collection, containing thirty chapters from a wide variety of disciplines and addressing the full range of Said's career. By comparison, Said's Rhetoric of the Secular, by the Canadian scholar Mathieu E. Courville, is a relatively slim monograph that focuses specifically on representations of the religious and the secular in Said's oeuvre. Taken together, these books honor two important and interrelated aspects of Said's work. The wide-ranging nature of Iskandar and Rustom's anthology conveys the sense of expansiveness-the rejection of the constricting grip of academic specialization and a concomitant ability to cross the boundaries that are too often set up between disciplines and topics-that Timothy Brennan, in his contribution to the volume, refers to approvingly as Said's intellectual generalism (111). And Said's unwavering commitment to close readings of texts, consciously adopted from his predecessors in philology and comparative literature, and his refusal to treat texts simply as objects to be manipulated within a larger polemical or didactical argument finds a nice reflection in Courville's careful readings. Rather than subject the complexities and idiosyncracies of Said's work to iron-clad overarching central argument, Courville maintains a flexibility that allows him to avoid the simplifications that have too often attended readings of these texts. Most notable in this respect is Courville's refusal to engage in the game of pointing to supposed contradictions, referring instead to Said's tendency, in the development of his work, to deal with what Courville refers to as irreconcilables, and what Said himself often called antinomies. Indeed, as Courville suggests in his introduction, where others have perceived apparent contradiction in Said's he instead chooses to locate some measure of coherence, or even at times startling lucidity (7).Both books express a frank admiration for Said's work and example, without thereby giving up the right to criticize when necessary. In this sense, they follow Said's dictum, quoted by Joseph Massad in his contribution, Affiliating with Said, to never privilege over criticism:e history of thought, to say nothing of political movements, is extravagantly illustrative of how the dictum solidarity before criticism means the end of criticism. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".