MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W792489377 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.18.1.44

The Cyber Sublime and the Virtual Mirror: Information and Media in the Works of Oshii Mamoru and Kon Satoshi

2009· article· fr· W792489377 on OpenAlex
William Gardner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSublimeHumanitiesArtInnocenceArt historyPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’influence des médias et de l’informatique sur les sociétés humaines constitue un des principaux thèmes façonnant les stratégies visuelles et les orientations philosophiques des animes de Oshii Mamoru et Kon Satoshi. L’analyse des Ghost in the Shell et Innocence d’Oshii révèle ainsi que le développement d’une esthétique du sublime cybernétique se trouve simultanément fondé sur un univers hiérarchique et animé par un rêve de transcendance. L’étude des films de Kon, tels Perfect Blue, Millennium Actress et Paprika, dévoile quant à elle une approche très différente des questions de représentation : celle du « miroir virtuel ». Dans ces œuvres, la réalité quotidienne est saturée de portails ressemblant à des miroirs, et menant à des lieux identitaires alternatifs où l’on se prête à des jeux intersubjectifs ; des espaces nonhiérarchiques qui, contrairement à la vision d’Oshii, suggèrent une vue immanente de l’univers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it