MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7949700

Feasibility of Developing a Refrigerant-Based Propulsion System for Small Spacecraft

2007· article· en· W7949700 on OpenAlex
Carl Seubert, Shawn William Miller, Joseph R. Siebert, Abbie Stewart, Henry J. Pernicka, Refugio Molina, Glenn Lightsey, Megan Sheridan, Brian McDaniels, Graham Walker, Michael Swartwout, Scott Franke

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spinal Disorders · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsionPropellantRefrigerantSpacecraftAerospace engineeringSpacecraft propulsionIn-space propulsion technologiesEngineeringAeronauticsSystems engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The clinical and radiographic results of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were compared between interspinous block-assisted anterior interbody fusion (block-assist group, n = 16) and anterior interbody fusion with no use of the block (nonassist group, n = 17) with an average follow-up of 7 years (range 1 1/3-13 years). Satisfactory relief of low-back pain, significantly early interbody union (union rate 88%, p < 0.05), and spontaneous fusion of pars defect (fusion rate 44%, p < 0.05) were obtained in the block-assist group. In the nonassist group, interbody union was markedly delayed (p < 0.05), the union rate was 53%, and spontaneous fusion of the pars was found in 12% of patients. The overall clinical results at final follow-up in both groups did not show a statistically significant difference, but the results tended to be superior in the block-assist group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it