MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7990953 · doi:10.59876/a-j4x6-qq00

La sagesse mondiale et l'audace de l'espoir

2006· article· en· W7990953 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyCourageTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Can society do better than it has done in the past? History suggests that the answer is no. Yet global crises challenge us to transcend the confines of pessimistic precedent. The article explores the nature of wisdom, hope, and courage in supporting the types of changes most people would like to see in the world. Wisdom is "knowledge of what is true and right coupled with just judgment as to action." Courage transforms wisdom into meaningful action. Hope inspires people to aspire toward dreams that others judge to be unrealistic. The article presents the story of the birth of Uniterra, a unique international development effort born of wisdom, hope, and courage. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207