MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W80149313 · doi:10.1177/000313480206800909

Immediate Postlaparotomy Small Bowel Obstruction: A 16-Year Retrospective Analysis

2002· article· en· W80149313 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Surgeon · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyLaparotomyBowel obstructionBowel functionMedical recordDefecation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a particularly vexing problem in the postoperative period. The goal of this study was to compare the results of operative versus nonoperative treatment. A secondary goal was to explore risk factors for necessitating reoperation in the immediate postoperative period. We conducted a historical cohort retrospective chart review at a university-affiliated hospital. The medical records of patients treated between 1985 and 2000 at the Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) who developed SBO after undergoing a laparotomy during that admission were reviewed. Postoperative SBO was defined as cessation of flatus or bowel movements after their resumption following operation. To compare operative versus nonoperative management of early postoperative mechanical SBO we used the following outcome measures: Reoperation rate, time to return of function, length of stay, and mortality. Of 52 patients who developed SBO in the immediate postoperative period 37 were male, 25 had colorectal surgery, and nine had a gastrectomy as the initial operation on admission; five had inflammatory bowel disease, six had a previous SBO, 22 had virgin abdomens before the current operation, and 11 had adhesions noted at the initial operation. The median time to the development of obstructive symptoms was 8 days (range 1-33). The reoperation rate was 42 per cent overall (67% in women and 32% in men, P = 0.02). For operatively treated patients the median time between onset of symptoms and surgery was 5 days [range 1-23, interquartile range (IQR) = 5]. The median time to the return of bowel function was greater in the operatively treated patients compared with nonoperatively treated patients [11.5 days (range 4-37, IQR = 11) vs 6 days (range 1-28, IQR = 7), P < 0.0001] as was median length of stay from onset of obstruction [23 days (range 6-60, IQR = 14) vs 12 days (range 2-45, IQR = 16), P < 0.009]. Operatively treated patients also stayed longer after their obstruction was relieved although not significantly longer [8 days (range 1-35, IQR = 11) vs 4.5 days (range 0-40, IQR = 10), P = 0.15]. There were 11 complications in nine of 22 patients who underwent operative treatment of their SBO. Immediate postoperative SBO can be treated nonoperatively in stable patients resulting in significantly quicker return of bowel function and shorter lengths of hospital stay. Definitive risk factors for immediate SBO could not be identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it