MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W80149313 · doi:10.1177/000313480206800909

Immediate Postlaparotomy Small Bowel Obstruction: A 16-Year Retrospective Analysis

2002· article· en· W80149313 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shannon A. Fraser, Ian Shrier, George H. Miller, Philip H. Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Surgeon · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyLaparotomyBowel obstructionBowel functionMedical recordDefecation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a particularly vexing problem in the postoperative period. The goal of this study was to compare the results of operative versus nonoperative treatment. A secondary goal was to explore risk factors for necessitating reoperation in the immediate postoperative period. We conducted a historical cohort retrospective chart review at a university-affiliated hospital. The medical records of patients treated between 1985 and 2000 at the Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) who developed SBO after undergoing a laparotomy during that admission were reviewed. Postoperative SBO was defined as cessation of flatus or bowel movements after their resumption following operation. To compare operative versus nonoperative management of early postoperative mechanical SBO we used the following outcome measures: Reoperation rate, time to return of function, length of stay, and mortality. Of 52 patients who developed SBO in the immediate postoperative period 37 were male, 25 had colorectal surgery, and nine had a gastrectomy as the initial operation on admission; five had inflammatory bowel disease, six had a previous SBO, 22 had virgin abdomens before the current operation, and 11 had adhesions noted at the initial operation. The median time to the development of obstructive symptoms was 8 days (range 1-33). The reoperation rate was 42 per cent overall (67% in women and 32% in men, P = 0.02). For operatively treated patients the median time between onset of symptoms and surgery was 5 days [range 1-23, interquartile range (IQR) = 5]. The median time to the return of bowel function was greater in the operatively treated patients compared with nonoperatively treated patients [11.5 days (range 4-37, IQR = 11) vs 6 days (range 1-28, IQR = 7), P < 0.0001] as was median length of stay from onset of obstruction [23 days (range 6-60, IQR = 14) vs 12 days (range 2-45, IQR = 16), P < 0.009]. Operatively treated patients also stayed longer after their obstruction was relieved although not significantly longer [8 days (range 1-35, IQR = 11) vs 4.5 days (range 0-40, IQR = 10), P = 0.15]. There were 11 complications in nine of 22 patients who underwent operative treatment of their SBO. Immediate postoperative SBO can be treated nonoperatively in stable patients resulting in significantly quicker return of bowel function and shorter lengths of hospital stay. Definitive risk factors for immediate SBO could not be identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American SurgeonSame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207