Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans ce texte, l’auteur propose une lecture de la critique du postnationalisme par Will Kymlicka. Pour ce faire, il examine cinq considérations qui confirment la tendance de nos sociétés à dépasser le nationalisme (mais non la nation). Selon lui, pour les tenants de l’identité postnationale, l’intégration politique est certes plus difficile à l’échelle régionale ou continentale qu’à l’échelle nationale. Elle n’est pourtant pas impossible, dès lors qu’elle rencontre, outre des dispositions politiques à la coopération entre États membres, des dispositions symboliques à la reconnaissance réciproque des peuples, ainsi qu’à la reconnaissance commune des principes voués à les fédérer. Le propos n’est pas ici d’exprimer souhaits ou utopies relativement à la « démocratie européenne ». Il n’est pas de définir ce que doit être l’Union européenne, mais d’énoncer la façon dont elle doit être comprise, en tant qu’« État postnational ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".