The evolution of publics in artistic and cultural events in Quebec and the United States: a situation appraisal.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis quelques décennies, les pratiques culturelles ayant un caractère plus classique, par exemple les sorties aux spectacles des arts d’interprétation, sont de moins en moins répandues parmi la population. C’est ce que l’on observe, entre autres, aux États-Unis et au Québec. Cet article montre comment ont évolué certaines pratiques culturelles dans ces deux sociétés et identifie les groupes sociaux où les changements sont les plus rapides. En outre, il est question des principaux déterminants sociaux de ces pratiques. Une incursion est également faite chez les personnes disposant d’un grand capital scolaire pour connaître, chez celles qui ne participent pas aux activités artistiques, quels en seraient les facteurs explicatifs. Il ressort que plusieurs facteurs interviennent dans la formation des publics et des non-publics et que certains sont plus caractéristiques des sociétés très hétérogènes comme l’est la société américaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".