MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W806145182 · doi:10.51644/aofh1991

Martin Luther's concerns with the numinous in the Lord's Supper

2005· article· en· W806145182 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConsensus · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupperNuminousTheologyArtPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The scholarly attention to Luther's understanding of the real presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper has been extensive.The early phase, up to 1520, while generally affirming the real presence, mainly addressed what Luther regarded as Roman Catholic aberrations.Subsequently Luther responded to the Swiss Reformed and German Anabaptist criticisms.Continuing to affirm the real presence, Luther elaborated several key motifs, such as the personal presence of Christ, the idea of testament and promise, the existential need for trust and for courage, the significance of love and faith.In the course of time, these motifs have received a detailed attention.At the same time, the motif of the numinous 1 has been rather neglected, namely Luther's intense awareness of the holiness of God along with the awe, humility, and joy which envelops the authentic experience of faith in Jesus Christ.Here Luther celebrated both God the Creator and God the Redeemer.Yet his awareness of the sense of the numinous, surrounding all of nature, was far exceeded by the encounter with the Word of God, the Holy Scriptures.This latter context elevated the Lord's Supper to its supernatural heights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it