School time, free time and leisure time: how to succeed in the French Junior High School system by organizing one's time.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les résultats présentés dans cet article découlent d’une réflexion sociologique sur le temps scolaire comme un champ d’analyse de la socialisation des collégiens en France. L’auteur y pose plusieurs questions relatives à l’intégration par l’élève des normes et des valeurs de l’école, aux articulations entre les temps sociaux et leurs effets sur les résultats scolaires. Deux types d’action sociale semblent se dégager de l’analyse : une action dilapidatrice et une action productive. Dans un premier cas, l’élève opte pour un principe de renforcement de l’ethos scolaire par la contraction du temps mort et la conversion du temps libre en temps scolaire ; dans le second cas, il adopte un principe de dilapidation du temps libre. Cette distinction permet à l’auteur de s’interroger sur le fonctionnement de l’école et, de façon plus large, sur le type d’activités que les structures de loisirs peuvent proposer afin de satisfaire les besoins personnels des adolescents sans remettre en cause les exigences sociales et temporelles de l’école.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".