MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W807819617

Foreign Trade Vessels on the Great Lakes: The Coast Guard's Regulatory Role

2007· article· en· W807819617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul M Wasserman

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Marine Safety & Security Council · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoast guardGuard (computer science)International tradeMaritime industryInternational watersBusinessFisheryGeographyEnvironmental protection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Seaway system, spanning approximately 2,300 miles, is a significant waterborne highway for foreign trade and commerce into and out of America's heartland. Each year, thousands of transits are made between ports on the Great Lakes by approximately 1,400 commercial vessels engaged in foreign trade. One little-known mission of the U.S. Coast Guard is to regulate private associations of U.S. pilots charged with providing safe navigation for these ships. Foreign trade vessels are oceangoing ships that are either owned or operated by foreign companies, or Canadian- or U.S.-owned or operated companies operating on registry endorsements and engaged in international trade. These vessels regularly enter the Great Lakes to deliver foreign cargo to U.S. and Canadian ports and load cargos destined for foreign countries. These vessels differ from domestic Great Lakes ships that engage exclusively in domestic trade and only rarely leave the Great Lakes system. This article discusses the pilotage, guidance, and safety measures taken by the U.S. Coast Guard on behalf of the shipping industry devoted to foreign trade that traverse the Great Lakes, as well as the regulations and rates that pertain to this industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Marine Safety & Security CouncilSame topicMilitary and Defense StudiesFrench-language works237,207