Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This case report describes an abnormally enlarged cadaveric appendix subsequently identified as a mucocele. An appendicular mucocele is defined as a general macroscopic dilation of the appendicular lumen caused by abnormal accumulation of mucous (Persaud, 2007). There has been no previous published report of an appendicular mucocele in the cadaver. Of the 608 cadavers dissected in the last 8 years at the University of Alberta this was our first observation. CASE REPORT The recorded cause of death for this 86 year old female patient was congestive heart failure. Routine dissection of the gastrointestinal system revealed an extremely large vermiform appendix. It was untethered and presented in the pelvic position i.e., directed toward the pelvic brim. Apart from of the usually large size, there were no overt signs of inflammation of the appendix or its surrounding tissue. The mesoappendix did not display any pathology and as expected, it contained the appendicular vessels. CONCLUSION This is the first reported case of an aberrantly enlarged mucocele appendix in the cadaver. Grant Funding Source : Professional Expense Allowance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".