Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TABle 1 Diagnostic criteria for encephalitis and encephalopathy of presumed infectious or autoimmune etiology* Major criterion (required) Altered mental status, defined as decreased or altered level of consciousness, lethargy, or personality change lasting 24 h with no alternative cause identified Minor criteria (two for possible encephalitis, 3 for probable or confirmed encephalitis) Documented fever 38.0C (100.4F) within 72 h before or after presentation Generalized or partial seizures not attributable to a pre-existing seizure disorder New onset of focal neurological findings Cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis (leukocyte count 510 6 /L) Abnormality of brain parenchyma on neuroimaging suggestive of encephalitis that is either new from previous studies or appears to be acute in onset Abnormality on electroencephalography that is consistent with encephalitis and not attributable to another cause *Adapted from reference 1; Confirmed encephalitis requires: pathological confirmation of brain inflammation consistent with encephalitis; pathological, microbiological or serological evidence of acute infection with a microorganism that is strongly associated with encephalitis from an appropriate clinical specimen; or laboratory evidence of an autoimmune condition that is strongly associated with encephalitis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it