MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W810039741 · doi:10.4314/jagst.v4i1.31673

A Bayesian Test for Equality of Scale Parameters of Several Exponential Distributions

2005· article· en· W810039741 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agriculture Science and Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOptimal Experimental Design Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChi-square testMathematicsStatisticsPearson's chi-squared testLikelihood-ratio testStatisticTest statisticBayesian probabilityLikelihood principleApplied mathematicsMonte Carlo methodExponential distributionStatistical hypothesis testingMaximum likelihoodLikelihood function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article develops a Bayesian test for equality of scale parameters of several exponential distributions. The null distribution of the test statistic is approximated by the chi-square distribution using heuristic reasoning in conjunction with the Wilson-Hilferty transfomation for the chi-square random variable. The accuracy of the chi-square approximation of the test statistic and the modified likelihood ratio statistic is examined and their powers compared using Monte Carlo simulation. The proposed test is found to be comparable to Bartlett's modified likelihood ratio test in terms of accuracy and power. A numerical example is included to illustrate the applications of these tests. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology Vol.4(1) 2002: 75-82

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it