MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction

2010· book-chapter· en· W810996987 on OpenAlexaff
Ke-Lin Du, M. N. S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunicationsTrunkingElectrical engineeringEngineeringRadio repeaterCommunications satelliteRadio communicationsSuperheterodyne receiverWirelessRadio broadcastingElectronic engineeringSatelliteRadio frequencyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subsequent to the mathematical theory of electromagnetic waves formulated by James Clerk Maxwell in 1873 and the demonstration of the existence of these waves by Heinrich Hertz in 1887, Guglielmo Marconi made history by using radio waves for transatlantic wireless communications in 1901. In 1906, amplitude modulation (AM) radio was invented by Reginald Fessenden for music broadcasting. In 1913, Edwin H. Armstrong invented the superheterodyne receiver, based on which the first broadcast radio transmission took place at Pittsburgh in 1920. Land-mobile wireless communication was first used in 1921 by the Detroit Police Department. In 1929, Vladimir Zworykin performed the first experiment of TV transmission. In 1933, Edwin H. Armstrong invented frequency modulation (FM). The first public mobile telephone service was introduced in 1946 in five American cities. It was a half-duplex system that used 120 kHz of FM bandwidth. In 1958, the launch of the SCORE (Signal Communication by Orbital Relay Equipment) satellite ushered in a new era of satellite communications. By the mid-1960s, the FM bandwidth was cut to 30 kHz. Automatic channel trunking was introduced in the 1950s and 1960s, with which full-duplex was introduced. The most important breakthrough for modern mobile communications was the concept of cellular mobile systems by AT&T Bell Laboratories in the 1970s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207