MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W814156786

Second City or Second Country? the Question of Canadian Identity in SCTV'S Transcultural Text

2009· article· en· W814156786 on OpenAlex
Erin Hanna

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCineaction! · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)Web syndicationIdentity (music)Order (exchange)HollywoodMovie theaterNarrativeCountryCultJungleMedia studiesAdvertisingHistoryArtArt historySociologyLiteratureLawPolitical scienceAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Take off, eh? When SCTV began broadcasting its programming day on September 21, 1976, viewers were introduced to new brand of television satire that would develop and grow with the show for its eight-year run. Between 1976 and 1984, SCTV moved from local television station, to North American syndication, to American network television and, finally, to pay-TV. The show was composed of series of sketches woven together with recurring characters and behind-the-scenes narratives about the machinations of fictional television network called SCTV. Though SCTV satirized and parodied American popular culture, two of the show's most successful characters were Bob and Doug McKenzie (Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas), simple-minded brothers whose primary interests in life included beer, back bacon, and finding topics for their two-minute show, White North. The McKenzie Brothers were huge sensation in Canada. (1) Most tellingly, in 1981, an Ottawa fan nominated Moranis and Thomas for the Order of Canada for their contribution to our cultural sense of (2) In 1982, Thomas and Moranis produced the comedy album Great White North, which sold 350,000 records in Canada and made the Billboard top ten in the U.S. (3) The pair even wrote, directed, and starred in 1983 film featuring the two characters, Strange Brew. Though it received mixed reviews, Strange Brew has since become cult classic in North America and the brothers are still intimately connected with identity. (4) In How to Get Mouse in Your Beer Bottle (1982), Rick Salutin argued that the tradition of entertainers who imitate a certain typical style for laughs was nothing new, but that Thomas and Moranis did not fall into the same tradition of Canadian self-putdown. (5) Salutin saw the pair differently. There was degree of pride in what they did and they appealed to an audience who may have seen themselves in Bob and Doug or simply enjoyed emulating them. (6) Although Salutin celebrates the McKenzie Brothers for their everyman quality, at the heart of these two characters is more rebellious streak. The story behind the popular duo is that Bob and Doug were conceived as response to content demands made during SCTV's run on CBC and in U.S. syndication. (7) The CBC had fewer commercials breaks than American television, so SCTV's writers were asked to fill two extra minutes in Canada. Because of broadcast regulations, the CBC asked that SCTV fill this time with content that was distinctly Canadian. In an interview for the Chicago Tribune, Rick Moranis describes their reaction, We thought this was ridiculous. Granted we grew up dominated by American culture and we love satirizing it, but we do the show in Canada, we write it here, we're Canadians--how can they ask us to be more Canadian? (8) In an article for Newsweek, Dave Thomas explains that their intention in creating Bob and Doug was to make a satiric statement on what happens when you try to make entertainment nationalistic issue. (9) Often masked by the McKenzie Brothers' wider popularity, is the fact that their very inception came from the desire to ridicule content regulations. What was meant to be sarcastic snipe at the CBC became North American phenomenon. In Cultural Identity and Diaspora (1990), Stuart Hall describes two notions of cultural identity: one is founded on the similarities of shared past (10) and the other is constituted by difference and made up of ruptures and discontinuities. (11) Hall's description points to the way in which cultural identity is continually being negotiated. It is a 'production', which is never complete, always in process, and always constituted within, not outside, representation. (12) This fluid notion of identity is key to understanding SCTVs representation of Canada in transcultural context. As signifiers of identity, Bob and Doug McKenzie play on these notions of similarities and difference. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it