MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W814156786

Second City or Second Country? the Question of Canadian Identity in SCTV'S Transcultural Text

2009· article· en· W814156786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin Hanna

Bibliographic record

VenueCineaction! · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)Web syndicationIdentity (music)Order (exchange)HollywoodMovie theaterNarrativeCountryCultJungleMedia studiesAdvertisingHistoryArtArt historySociologyLiteratureLawPolitical scienceAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Take off, eh? When SCTV began broadcasting its programming day on September 21, 1976, viewers were introduced to new brand of television satire that would develop and grow with the show for its eight-year run. Between 1976 and 1984, SCTV moved from local television station, to North American syndication, to American network television and, finally, to pay-TV. The show was composed of series of sketches woven together with recurring characters and behind-the-scenes narratives about the machinations of fictional television network called SCTV. Though SCTV satirized and parodied American popular culture, two of the show's most successful characters were Bob and Doug McKenzie (Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas), simple-minded brothers whose primary interests in life included beer, back bacon, and finding topics for their two-minute show, White North. The McKenzie Brothers were huge sensation in Canada. (1) Most tellingly, in 1981, an Ottawa fan nominated Moranis and Thomas for the Order of Canada for their contribution to our cultural sense of (2) In 1982, Thomas and Moranis produced the comedy album Great White North, which sold 350,000 records in Canada and made the Billboard top ten in the U.S. (3) The pair even wrote, directed, and starred in 1983 film featuring the two characters, Strange Brew. Though it received mixed reviews, Strange Brew has since become cult classic in North America and the brothers are still intimately connected with identity. (4) In How to Get Mouse in Your Beer Bottle (1982), Rick Salutin argued that the tradition of entertainers who imitate a certain typical style for laughs was nothing new, but that Thomas and Moranis did not fall into the same tradition of Canadian self-putdown. (5) Salutin saw the pair differently. There was degree of pride in what they did and they appealed to an audience who may have seen themselves in Bob and Doug or simply enjoyed emulating them. (6) Although Salutin celebrates the McKenzie Brothers for their everyman quality, at the heart of these two characters is more rebellious streak. The story behind the popular duo is that Bob and Doug were conceived as response to content demands made during SCTV's run on CBC and in U.S. syndication. (7) The CBC had fewer commercials breaks than American television, so SCTV's writers were asked to fill two extra minutes in Canada. Because of broadcast regulations, the CBC asked that SCTV fill this time with content that was distinctly Canadian. In an interview for the Chicago Tribune, Rick Moranis describes their reaction, We thought this was ridiculous. Granted we grew up dominated by American culture and we love satirizing it, but we do the show in Canada, we write it here, we're Canadians--how can they ask us to be more Canadian? (8) In an article for Newsweek, Dave Thomas explains that their intention in creating Bob and Doug was to make a satiric statement on what happens when you try to make entertainment nationalistic issue. (9) Often masked by the McKenzie Brothers' wider popularity, is the fact that their very inception came from the desire to ridicule content regulations. What was meant to be sarcastic snipe at the CBC became North American phenomenon. In Cultural Identity and Diaspora (1990), Stuart Hall describes two notions of cultural identity: one is founded on the similarities of shared past (10) and the other is constituted by difference and made up of ruptures and discontinuities. (11) Hall's description points to the way in which cultural identity is continually being negotiated. It is a 'production', which is never complete, always in process, and always constituted within, not outside, representation. (12) This fluid notion of identity is key to understanding SCTVs representation of Canada in transcultural context. As signifiers of identity, Bob and Doug McKenzie play on these notions of similarities and difference. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0540.027
Scholarly communication0.0240.008
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCineaction!Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207