DONAHUE, Charles Jr. — Law, Marriage, and Society in the Later Middle Ages: Arguments about Marriage in Five Courts.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We compared the variation in pacing thresholds of two widely used temporary pacing electrodes at different epicardial sites in 67 patients after coronary artery operations performed with either cardioplegia or ventricular fibrillation. In 33 patients, a bare, braided pacing wire (DW) was placed on the right ventricle and a Medtronic localized epicardial electrode (MED), on each ventricle. In the other 34 patients, the DW wire was placed on the right atrium and a MED electrode, on each atrium. Pacing thresholds were measured at the time of placement; at 1 hour, 6 hours, and 12 hours postoperatively; and daily for 4 days. The pacing thresholds (mean +/- standard error of the mean) at implantation were as follows: DW wire = 0.93 +/- 0.08 V and MED electrode = 0.63 +/- 0.1 V in the ventricles and DW = 1.28 +/- 0.18 V and MED = 0.65 +/- 0.09 V in the atria. On the fourth postoperative day, the pacing thresholds were DW = 2.08 +/- 0.21 V and MED = 1.19 +/- 0.22 V in the ventricles and DW = 2.33 +/- 0.29 V and MED = 1.04 +/- 0.09 V in the atria. The pacing thresholds of both types of wire increased significantly over time, but this deterioration was more pronounced with the braided wire both on the ventricle and on the atrium. The pacing threshold patterns were not affected by chamber side or mode of myocardial preservation. The braided ventricular wire failed to capture after 24 hours in 9 of 30 patients, whereas the localized epicardial electrode captured in all instances (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it