MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W815435656

Developing Zircon as a Probe of Planetary Impact History

2014· article· en· W815435656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. M. Wielicki

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHadeanZirconImpact craterAstrobiologyEarly EarthGeologyEarth scienceGeologic recordPaleontologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The identification of Meteor Crater in Arizona as an extraterrestrial impact by Eugene Shoemaker provided the first evidence of this geologic phenomenon and opened the door to a new field of research that has eventually lead to the identification of over ~150 terrestrial impact structures. Subsequently impacts have been evoked in the formation of the moon, delivery of volatiles and bio-precursors to early Earth, creation of habitats for the earliest life and, in more recent times, major mass extinction events. However, understanding the impact flux to the Earth-Moon system has been complicated by the constant weathering and erosion at Earth's surface and the complex nature of impactite samples such that only a hand full of terrestrial craters have been accurately and precisely dated. Currently 40Ar/39Ar step-heating analysis of impactite samples is commonly used to infer impact ages but can be problematic due to the presence of relic clasts, incomplete 40Ar outgassing or excess 40Ar, and recoil and shock effects. The work presented here attempts to develop zircon geochronology to probe planetary impact histories as an alternative to current methods and provides another tool by which to constrain the bolide flux to the Earth-Moon system.\tZircon has become the premier geo-chronometer in earth science and geochemical investigation of Hadean zircon from Western Australia has challenged the long-standing, popular conception that the near-surface Hadean Earth was an uninhabitable and hellish world; Zircons may preserve environmental information regarding their formation and thus provide a rare window into conditions on early Earth. Isotopic and petrologic analyses of these ancient grains have been interpreted to suggest that early Earth was more habitable than previously envisioned, with water oceans, continental crust, and possibly even plate tectonics. The Hadean is also suspected to be a time of major planetary bombardment however identifying impact signatures within the Hadean population remains difficult and this study hopes to develop criteria to recognize impact zircon and possibly provide constraints on the early impactor flux.\tFive large terrestrial craters, Vredefort and Morokweng, South Africa, Sudbury and Manicouagan, Canada, and Popigai, Russia, are the focus of this study as smaller craters do not have the energy to produce thick melt sheets, which persist over time-scales sufficient for crystallization of zircon, permitting geochemical and geochronological analysis. Geochemical analysis of these impact-produced zircons yields similar chemical signatures to endogenic igneous zircon from crustal melts and highlights the need for well-developed criteria for discriminating impact and endogenic grains for impact geochronology. One such criterion is modeling of impact zircon crystallization temperature spectra for simulated impact events on targets of varying composition. Provided some assumptions the zircon crystallization spectra can be estimated from well established Zr systematics in crustal melts. Results for impacts into an Archean terrestrial surface (used as a proxy for the Hadean as little to no rock record exists >4.0 Ga) yields a crystallization spectra significantly higher than that reported for the Hadean zircon population and appears to rule out impacts as a dominant source for these ancient grains.\tWhen no dateable impact melt sheet exists, either due to the lack of energy of the impact itself or from subsequent erosion at Earth's surface, loss of radiogenic lead, Pb*, has been suggested as an alternative method to date the event. Pb*-loss was investigated from target rocks from Vredefort and Morokweng and suggests that Pb* diffusion, even in zircon isolated from shocked and brecciated target rocks, is remarkably slow. This may explain the seeming lack of 'reset' zircon in terrestrial impactites. Little is known about Pb* diffusion pathways associated with shock microstructures introduced during impact cratering and future diffusion studies may provide better constraints on this problem.\tAlthough little disturbance was identified in Pb* of target zircon, other low temperature geochronometers, zircon (U-Th)/He dating in this case, have been shown to be completely 'reset' and accurately date impacts. Zircon (U-Th)/He ages isolated from the target rock below ~850 m of well-dated impact melt at Morokweng yield ages consistent with the impact melt sheet and provide an alternative tool to dating events where such melts no longer exists. This geochronometer was also applied to impactites from Popigai, Russia and results in an age that is significantly younger than that reported in the literature and coincident with the Eocene-Oligocene boundary mass extinction event however the lack of any impact signatures at this boundary is puzzling.\tConstraining the impact flux to the Earth-Moon system not only allows for a better understanding into early Earth evolution and the formation of a habitable planet but also provides constraints on the modern impactor flux, important criteria for estimating the likelihood of future impact events. Zircon geochronology offers an exciting new tool by which to date impact events and has the potential to assist understanding of complex impactite samples from terrestrial craters and future sample return missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207